• frog 🐸@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Making sure their turnover also gets split into hundreds of companies seems like an administrative nightmare though. And I suspect the EU regulators are smart enough to see through such a ruse - eBay would still be one website, not hundreds, after all.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, exactly. 10MM is peanuts to huge tech companies. It’s not reasonable to split up services in a way that would still be profitable.

      The Fediverse would likely be exempt, but any social media with advertising and any scale at all will hit 10MM revenue pretty quickly.

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I think the fact that the Fediverse is genuinely and legitmately multiple small websites, each of which can be proven to be run by different people with no connection to each other, would mean it’s exempt.

        • DosDude👾@retrolemmy.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Well, most are run by 1 person or a small team. None have profits. Some have donation pages, and that’s it. So they are exempt by definition.

    • MaggiWuerze@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just put the moderation business into a separate entity with no real revenue, which has no more than 49 regular employees and employ the rest as freelancers. Bam.

      • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        That would probably work in the US, but I’m not so sure it’d work in the EU. Even the UK is capable of cracking down on “freelancers” who are obviously just regular employees with bosses trying to dodge regulation.