Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 8 months agoAI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comexternal-linkmessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1122arrow-down10
arrow-up1122arrow-down1external-linkAI is modeling David Attenborough and the filmmaker isn’t happywww.androidpolice.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareJohnEdwa@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·8 months agoIf it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
minus-squaresculd@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 months agoAgreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
minus-squareRandoCalrandian@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoIs there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?
If it’s something for profit by some massive multi billion dollar company, definitely. That’s just pure greed. But some tiny indie game dev or YouTuber using ai voiceovers is quite a bit more acceptable imo.
Agreed. Butterbee’s explanation in this thread is much better than my word.
Is there a specific dollar amount where a creator isn’t allowed to create the way they want anymore?