Yunanistan sounds made up

Works here too, but when I tried to save it to the Internet Archive the saved page doesn’t have AI results 😟

Rickroll: (v) to troll the youth using memes

Makes sense!

Ironically, it’s a pretty well-known one itself (you see people just refer to it by mentioning “today’s 10000”).

Hmm, I think they’re close enough to be able to say a neural network is modelled on how a brain works - it’s not the same, but then you reach the other side of the semantics coin (like the “can a submarine swim” question).

The plasticity part is an interesting point, and I’d need to research that to respond properly. I don’t know, for example, if they freeze the model because otherwise input would ruin it (internet teaching them to be sweaty racists, for example), or because it’s so expensive/slow to train, or high error rates, or it’s impossible, etc.

When talking to laymen I’ve explained LLMs as a glorified text autocomplete, but there’s some discussion on the boundary of science and philosophy that’s asking is intelligence a side effect of being able to predict better.

Humans invent stuff (without realising) it to, so I don’t think that’s enough to disqualify something from being intelligent.

The interesting question is how much of this is due to the training goal basically being “a sufficiently convincing response to satisfy a person” (pretty much the same as on social media) and how much of it is a fundamental flaw in the whole idea.

I agree to your broad point, but absolutely not in this case. Large Language Models are 100% AI, they’re fairly cutting edge in the field, they’re based on how human brains work, and even a few of the computer scientists working on them have wondered if this is genuine intelligence.

On the spectrum of scripted behaviour in Doom up to sci-fi depictions of sentient silicon-based minds, I think we’re past the halfway point.

I had to check, but the real thing is the Dairy Council and this is a parody account. Obviously it’s way more interesting than the real @dairyuk account.

You’re claiming that Generative AI isn’t AI? Weird claim. It’s not AGI, but it’s definitely under the umbrella of the term “AI”, and at the more advanced end (compared to e.g. video game AI).

This one’s obviously fake because of the capitalisation errors and .. but the fact that it’s otherwise (kinda) plausible shows how useless AI is turning out to be.

I’m going to tag you in next time I lose the game.

https://youtu.be/O9ITcAbVGkU for those who want to hear it

It only looked ok in the textarea you wrote it in, but the format was wrong.

You have a few options:

* lists
* with a * or -

• lists
• with a * or -

Blank

Lines

For paragraphs

Blank

Lines

For paragraphs

Double spaces  
At end of lines  
If you don't want paragraphs

Double spaces
At end of lines
If you don’t want paragraphs

It looked like you were trying to use code formatting which is three backticks, but you used single quotes. This is a backtick: `

Then
It'll  keep   exactly what you write
l1I|

It’s

• Obtain a list of all tabs, and which URL is open
• Obtain a list of all firefox windows and which tab is in each and in what order
• Obtain a list of firefox running instances
• Actions on tabs
• Close a tab
• Open a new tab and enter URL
• move a tab in a window’s tab order
• move a tab to another window
• mute/unmute a tab
• make a tab hidden or unhide
• pin/unpin a tab
• select/unselect a tab
• discard a tab
• reload a tab
• copy tab body or a specific xpath
• run a javascript cmdlet, (bookmarklet ? )
• Run a function of a script in somethingmonkey
• bookmarks
• list all bookmarks folder and bookmarks
• move a bookmark to another folder
• delete a bookmark
• create a bookmark
• get/change position of a firefox window
• close a window/open a new window
• list installed addons
• turn an addon on or off

Seems that this has been asked before, and Wikipedia has gone for inaptronym

I like nominative ironicism or unaptonym.

4 out of 4, which seems a slightly unintuitive scale

Finally, there’s a level 4 sting, which is as bad as it can get. Schmidt knows of only three critters capable of inflicting level-4 suffering: the warrior wasp (Synoeca septentrionalis), a two-and-a-half-inch-long black bug found in the tropics; the bullet ant (Paraponera clavata), also tropical; and the tarantula hawk (genus Pepsis), two inches long, which Schmidt can find in his yard in Tucson.

– The Straight Dope

btw, this image is a legit snippet from the wikipedia page Schmidt sting pain index although it doesn’t make clear that Schmidt didn’t get stung on purpose for science.

In addition, the “Search Bar” settings in Settings > Search, which let you choose between using the address bar for search and navigation or add the search bar in the toolbar, is also gone in Firefox 122.

This doesn’t affect me, but I’m sure there’s going to be a vocal tiny percent that absolutely hate this news.

Yeah, the same kid:

You’re allowed not to know! It’s just that since you’d got Picard I thought you’d know the rest since they’re from the same show (Star Trek: The Next Generation).

Seeing as I’ve just discovered you can use tables on Lemmy, I’ll give you a proper answer:

Interesting point. So it’s more like