As a software dev, any code library named SimpleWhatever or whose documentation contains the word “simply” anywhere makes me afraid.
Because they never are. They are a sign that whoever makes them thinks the subject is too hard to understand.
The end result is a code library that doesn’t make the inherent important hard parts organized and clear to work with, but obfuscates them.
HOOOONK HOOOONK HOOOONK! …if you know what I mean. ;)
Eagerly waiting for Tactical Breach Wizards to release…
If you check a DragEvent’s currentTarget it will always point to some appendage of a “dom”.
He keeps posting stuff like that. People report it.
Sometimes the lemmy.ml mods notice the reports and drop by to tell people to stop reporting him or ban anyone who disagree too loudly.
First ever (?) entry to end up more dressed at the end of the performance than at the start start.
Like a reverse Spain.
Nemo Mettler, proud nonbinary from Switzerland, won the Eurovision.
I wonder how many seconds this would last on [email protected]
That’s NOT how Bitcoin works. Listen-
“Hurgh!” -Steve
I am. The mun.
Cliff Stoll
vihart
Any context? Or is it just a random person dying horribly?
It’s a fascinating field! Simplified: Make a machine that it is impossible to guess the likely outcome of with odds larger than 50/50.
We are talking any tiny advantageous guess here. If I predict 50/50 that a coin will go heads up, slight imbalances will cause it to go heads on average 51 times out of 100 tosses. Play for a dollar a million times, and I’m rich.
And if I know roughly how you will toss the coin, I can improve my prediction another tiny amount by knowing which side was up when you lift it up to toss it.
The field is about making a process that successfuly hides information so I can’t know what state the internal workings of the coin tosser is at any time. It has huge overlap with cryptography.
All batmans are valid. All batmans are loved.
A “trickle down” setting