To the extent of “what does calling out anyone for anything lead to an interesting nuanced discussion” so should we ban calling people out?

Ultimately it’s ambiguous and we need to draw a line in the sand somewhere, but it’s reasonable for people to disagree where to draw that line.

There is no curse in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of Men for this treachery

It was the other company CEO with dubious ties.

Wait… Who is “it” in “it’s CEO”??? Which CEO has ties?

I guess I’ll have to actually read the article.

Freak on a leash with a boner

We both have issues. But as I said, at least I have a modicum of self-awareness.

I don’t expect you to go back and check, but I think you know that’s not how the hostility started.

Anyways, I’ll lay off now unless you ask a question or say something wildly out of line, but I’d like to part with this: your take here doesn’t seem to align with other things you’ve said in your (public) comment history on your (public) profile. We’re all forced to play the capitalist game, but you’re not going to be rewarded for this kind of devotion to your boss.

Sorry for catching you in your hypocrisy? 🤷

How do you reconcile what you’re saying here with your anti-billionaire stance on your other comments? Sometimes someone needs to hold up a mirror.

Only to fascists and bigots.

You talk like a bootlicker. At least I have a modicum of self-awareness.

No, you’re right. Being fun at a party of techbros is totally a sign of superiority and not at all a sign of sociopathy 🤮

Tbf you’re probably not a terrible person, but that is a bad take. Rejecting someone based entirely on education, and not allowing for other factors (as is implied), is just bad for both your company and society.

Let me rephrase, to make myself crystal clear, because you didn’t get the tactful approach: that’s a shitty filter. By excluding people without a degree, you’re saying that ability to afford university for 4 years is more important than skill, experience, or knowledge.

It shows that you’re ignorant. It shows that your company has a toxic workplace.

It’s probably one of the dumbest flexes I’ve ever seen.

I have a bachelor’s of computer science, but some of the best coders I met just did a 2 year community college diploma.

I don’t think that spending lots of money on education is really a great litmus test, it’s just one minor indicator.

Intent to support and support in effect are separate things. You can do one without the other. When you conflate the two, it muddies the water (although it is still good to point out that accidentally supporting something is still support)

Absolutely no punctuation not even a comma or anything everywhere you could have used a line break even great comment

Honestly I think they made the right call wrt catalytic converters. The stuff that they turn into CO2 is a much more potent and urgent threat than the CO2.

The CO2 problem should have been solved with fuel efficiency, but as we’ve discovered here, it wasn’t. After realizing the unintended consequences of their laws, they refused to go back to them and admit there was a problem, because admitting means they were wrong and they can’t have that.

(Also passengers cars aren’t really the problem. At least they’re small fish, that we’ve been tricked into focusing on so that the real polluters can avoid scrutiny).

It makes me think that rather than posting in a community, you should post to the void (your user feed?) and tag the (all) appropriate community(ies) to have it also show up in their feed

Probably to late at this point

I’ve asked and never gotten a firm answer on appropriate crossposting etiquette. Sometimes something applies to multiple communities, and when it does do you you:

• post it in each community.
• post it in one community and share that post to the other communities.
• stfu and only post the one place.

Who knows???

Fair dudes