Assuming you’re saying that you’re a woman who enjoys sex with men (not the only option of course, but probably the only one “milder” in the eyes of a bigot than homosexuals), answering yes to all of those still makes you an enemy of the patriarchy:

you shouldn’t love men - you should be subservient to them, you shouldn’t enjoy hobbies - you should be constantly pregnant and carrying at least one more child on your hip while making sure the house is tidy and your husband is fed, you shouldn’t enjoy sex - especially not the kind that isn’t for making babies, they save that for the “whore” (in their eyes) that they cheat on their wife with.

So not as scary to them as a potential cock up the arse (because they truly believe the gays are after their dirty buttholes), but really just about as threatening to their “traditional” way of life as homosexuals are… I’d wear it as a badge of honour lol

I’d say “dirt” is close enough to the reality…

Yeah, thanks, I couldn’t quite see what was under the other handwriting, but now that you mention it it’s obvious, as is the swastika next to it. There’s also some words above and bellow the sketch that I couldn’t make out…

Those, and I can also make out:

• They tried scratching out “anarchist” in the title and replace it with “homosexual”
• “Do you love men?”
• “Do you have feminine hobbies?”
• “Do you love dick in your ass and mouth?”
• a badly drawn hitler in the left margine

So yeah, definitely nazi alert

I’m sad to say I hadn’t heard of her before now, what an amazing woman (and also fuck IBM).

Reading through her wiki I found her blog (journal?) and while I’m only halfway through part 1, I’d definitely say it’s worth reading (browser tried to stop me going through saying site was unsafe, but I clicked through anyway and it seems perfectly fine to me).

Ew.

But as I said - “either way” so my earlier reply still stands, and your actual reasoning is in fact even more gross than if it was an attempt at a not all men (it’s paternalistic, condescending, even authoritative, and ableist too - other people’s health is none of your business nor is what substances someone might use to ease their pain, and you, or any other individual for that matter definitely shouldn’t have any say in what others consume or how they enjoy themselves as long as they aren’t harming others. And no, you considering others a “burden” on the health system isn’t actually harming you, that’s just more ableism with a pinch of eugenics on your part).

E: Giving you the benefit of the doubt I assume you’re pro choice which really makes me wonder how you settle that “my body my choice” stance with this nonsense… (I don’t actually care, that’s just for you to try to explain to yourself)

Is this some sort of reverse not all men or something?

Either way - I don’t think people having a glass of whatever at the end of a day to wind down (and harming no one but possibly their own liver in the process) are comparable to those who drink excessively and turn violent and even murderous all in defence of their toxic masculinity.

(E: and no, I don’t drink, I just couldn’t care less what others consume as long as they aren’t harming others)

Imagine how much nicer a world we’d live in if toxic men avoided alcohol for its supposed testosterone lowering qualities in the same way they avoid soy for its supposed oestrogen heightening properties…

I am not American, and TIL Charlie Kirk is a real person in the media and not just a stock photo of a guy with a memeable face… 😂