deleted by creator

Removed by mod

I just edit resolv.conf directly, and then do chattr +i /etc/resolv.conf to make it persistent

Well, it fixes the issue when I logged in. But my login program still looks unreadable with non English language.

I setup correct font in /etc/vconsole.conf and even tried to add setfont to early init file. Still no luck. I guess getty resets it…

That mounting drives with their uuid as the mount location is insane

Why tho? Kernel sometimes can index drives in different order (if you have multiple drives), screwing your mount locations. But UUID is always the same

No, it’s Patrick

Darkness is actually great in areas without light pollution! Like polar opposite to “depressing”

You might try flashing OpenWRT firmware if your router is supported. It allows changing DNS

Tried to reconfigure some systemd services, switched to Artix (runit flavored btw)

What makes you so sure about that?

What notifications? (I’m too lazy to setup notification daemon)

There’s not enough “k” in your komment to be a valid excuse

sudo su

Why spawn additional process when you can get into shell directly with sudo -s?

Because the other option is to starve to death.

That’s pessimistic… Food can be grown…

theft includes the net profits that are not shared with the workers

How businesses would innovate without accumulating capital? What happens if they suffer a loss? What would they pay their workers?

IMO it’s not theft, it’s just a price you’re paying for someone else to deal with risc possible losses while providing you stable income.

Not talking about reserch, marketing and realization of goods/services, that someone without capital can’t do on their own.

By that logic, thieves are virtuous and valued by society.

Thieves are forced to return what they stole, they don’t (usually) accumulate capital

In reality, the wealthy are creating value for themselves and their peers

Could you please provide an example? Even something like Apple products (luxuries) are used by people that can’t be called rich. So it’s hard for me to understand how wealthy could create their separate economy

First of all lobbying and any other intrusion into fair competition is incompatible with free market.

As for the “rich” — without government enforced monopolies, their wealth is a representation of how much value they provide to society. Which roughly translates into their support by society. A bit like representative democracy, but more decentralized.

Of course, because “every organization is less effective than individual” :P

Additionally it’s “literally socialism”

They don’t want to admit it but they are just a few steps away from anarchy.

Pretty much everyone admits it. Minarchist (pro minimal govt) flag is literally ancap with black changed to blue.

Soo the, we got problems to big for one person alone to solve. If we let every fucker do whatever he wants we going down fast. We need inteligente population orientated to something good, organizerd trough democracy.

Free Market is essentially a “continuous democratic process”. If what somebody does benefit people, he gets incentivised with profits. If people see no value in what he’s doing – he gets losses. And if in the process of " doing whatever he wants" he does any harm to others ge gets sued.

And all of this happens constantly instead of once in a couple of years, without almost any accountability from those who’re in power as it works in republic.

I don’t understand how Americans practice Christianity that it traumatizes people? I remember hearing from someone else how religion had traumatized him from childhood. Which is strange to hear for me since I’ve been introduced to Christianity as a child, but don’t care much about religion or “hell” nowadays…

Eating is overrated anyway