I think that is the worst thing trolling has done to internet culture: People will assume that their conversation partner is not arguing in good faith as the standard assumption.

Yes sir/ma’am daddy/mommy

Don’t commend me too hard - it’s actually a copypasta I found online a while ago

“Of in” sounds similar to “oven”. In the context of the joke, “of in” itself has two meanings, while at the same time sounding like the word “oven”. When you say you “of in”, there’s a clever triple meaning at play: “of in” could be referring to three things: 1. the act of inserting the food into the apparatus; 2. the presence of heat emitted from the apparatus; 3. a pun of “oven”. The joke then makes the claim that “of out” is the antonym of “of in”. If “of in” means inserting the food, then “of out” means removing the food; if “of in” means heat is present within the food, then “of out” means heat is absent from the food.

Here’s an example of a sentence that uses all the definitions of “of in” and “of out”: When a food is considered cold, the heat from the oven is “of out” (absent from) the food; so you “of in” (insert) the cold food into the oven, then you “of out” (remove) the food from the oven once the heat from the oven is “of in” (present within) the food.

The punchline of the joke hinges on the origin of the name given to the apparatus, oven. The premise of the punchline insists the name “oven” has to come from “of in”. If a claim is made that oven is named after the act of inserting cold food into the apparatus (of in), then according to the joke, it does not make sense, because the heat from the apparatus is absent from the food (of out). Conversely, if oven is named after the presence of heat from the apparatus within the hot food (of in), then it conflicts with the fact that hot food is removed from the apparatus (of out).

The humor of the punchline comes from the flawed logic used to deduce to origin of the name “oven”. The logic is flawed in such a way that one who uses it to find the etymology of “oven” would simply be stuck in an endless cycle of speculation and end up never finding the answer they are looking for.

But what, oh person inside my phone, what would you think of me, after hearing this shocking confession:

I…

I did not always comment…

Well, at least I heard there will be other people

How did you get this photograph of me, and how dare you doxx me like that? D:

Now that you brought it up: I only today learned the completely legit and in no way misleading translation of what is being said:

Hey, my favourite video of all time on YT is by a Pole!

I feel that. Personally, I loved reddit back then and Lemmy now, because it’s content-focused instead of user-focused. But it still has enough user accountability for it to work out, unlike e.g. something like the *chans, where it devolves into a cesspool of edgy nonsense quickly.

On Lemmy/old Reddit, there are visible powerusers and drama, sure, but on average the experience one will have when posting something is engagement with their content, instead of engagement with their person.

I never was able to get into any other social media, never really saw the appeal of it either. I feel like I want to not be seen, at least not intensely, and instead my content and my thoughts and opinions to be engaged with, reflected, developed. Most social media has only gotten worse in drifting into the other direction, with people becoming brands advertising themselves as a marketable package, chasing that dream of living on fame.

I genuinely think the main ideological function isn’t even as much to promote that, as it is to focus personal dreams and fantasies towards wanting to become a part of the “winners”. Not that it isn’t part of it, just by normalising it as status quo even within fantasies, but I think even more powerful is to have people fantasise about being one of the chosen ones eventually.

Quick reminder that stuff like this is not planned like in some conspiracy, but just a result of dynamics happening (almost exclusively, rare exceptions) unconsciously the way ideology springs from the material base.

Allah? More like allahp mah bussy, am I right?

How about this story about a young English boy that gets bullied by the poo people, until he finds out he is actually super special. And then he fights the super specials that want society to be structured around birthright, because he has a special born fate to stop them. All while the super specials have used their amazing magical powers, able to literally mold reality to their whims, to create their own version of liberal capitalism.

The short answer: It made me interested in non-commercial alternatives. The fact that the main devs are communists in their own right (even though not necessarily of the same school of thought as myself, but close enough), certainly helped, too.

BTW, just in case you are concerned about that - they are commited to free software principles and the software they develop here is certainly politically agnostic, and they can’t and won’t keep anyone from hosting their own instances with their own focus or forking the software in the worst case.

Nowadays, definitely. 4 years ago, when this was originally posted? Back when I first engaged a little bit here before hibernating until the big exodus, my most engaged post had like 30-something upvotes.

Ah, just like what Slavoj Zizek said about Stalinists: Joining into the applause themselves /s

In all seriousness, amazing work you are doing, one of the few projects I support financially, even with being on a subsistence-level income.

EDIT: You know what? I’ll just leave this here for good measure:
https://join-lemmy.org/donate

Well, I am not on Mastodon myself, because twitter-like social media isn’t my cup of tea, but from what I heard, engagement there seems to happen much more on a following-hashtags level than following-users level, so maybe (ab)using hashtags more might do the trick.

As 10 Lemmy upvotes are equal or greater than 100 Million YT views according to this metric, I am already deep into the billions of views, the whole population of the world has already viewed this several times

We can all be alone by ourselves here together ❤️

100% right - I type while bathing in those sweet, sweet endorphins and taking in my brain thinking it’s inside a valued person for a change