![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/q98XK4sKtw.png)
It took Microsoft 98 attempts the first time! Then it took them an entire Millennium. Then 2000 attempts after that. And then after 12 more attempts, they’ve decided they need to change the keyboard… I’d say #14 ain’t too bad.
It took Microsoft 98 attempts the first time! Then it took them an entire Millennium. Then 2000 attempts after that. And then after 12 more attempts, they’ve decided they need to change the keyboard… I’d say #14 ain’t too bad.
…did he get his prize?
Well, if these people had even an ounce of self-awareness, they’d realize that there’s no system that works well for them and only them and no one else that is sustainable. That’s how people lose their heads. So, to answer your question, they would and should change it because, if they don’t, their power doesn’t last.
If they had to get mad at reality, there’d be a lot less to be mad about. Being mad about made-up BS is a way for them to have their cake and eat it too. It’s boogeymen all the way down.
That is either a bad or poorly calibrated printer. For Pete’s sake, man, fix that shit.
Because Christians turned it upside down and said “Oh wow… this star looks like a goat with horns”.
I don’t know about this. Although I understood the approach and where the changes came from in terms of usability, using the new approach was more difficult for me. I just set myself some basic parameters and attempted to create a few curves and I found it easier with the “old” way. It’s possible that it’s simply because I’m used to using it the old way but I would want to see this fully in action before I would agree that this is an improvement.
As someone who hasn’t really been following, what anti-user decisions are those?
I’m pretty sure that the bat is photoshopped in. Her hand position doesn’t look like it’s actually holding anything.