Hell yeah brother. Never forget the most important step a man can take: the next one.
Hell yeah brother. Never forget the most important step a man can take: the next one.
Most users of Windows aren’t editing the registry, no matter what problems they encounter.
For power users that do use regedit, I’d argue there’s still a gap between that and using a shell. The registry can be edited entirely with the Windows graphical utility, after all.
Seems legit as a concept, though the author is giving weird vibes.
I’m not sure what “globohomo” means but it sounds like a 4chan homophobic term. Additionally the author says they wanted a search engine giving results without “political inclinations”, which reads to me as “reality has a liberal bias and I don’t like that”.
I’ll pass on this for now.
Honestly mad respect for owning it. No one’s perfect all the time, and it takes a lot of courage to be able to admit when those mistakes happen.
In my opinion, that makes you MORE qualified to be a mod – not less.
I appreciate that, friend. I hope my comment didn’t come off as flippant. I absolutely believe you’ve seen the shit you’re railing against, I just haven’t seen it (on Lemmy) myself.
Jokes on you, whippersnapper! My ass is behind 7 proxies layers of depends!
Fellas, is it geriatric to not want food poisoning?
I know I’m being that guy here, but this is a butchering of the meme format. Woof.
I get what you mean, but considering how many influential people are having their anti-trans opinions broadcast (see: JKR), I think this kind of article is more necessary than you might think.
Hilarious as all the other answers are, my guess is that this species has more complex sex chromosomes than the XX/XY variations we’re familiar with – perhaps there are more than 2 slots for the chromosomes to go, and then there are more than 2 options per slot, resulting in the humongous number of options stated in the post.
I’ve made an effort to engage with you, to tell you why a person would disagree with your opinion without belittling you. I even outright said at the end of my last comment that I don’t agree that calling for violence against the police is the right course of action.
You clearly haven’t even read my comments, much less tried to explain your own position.
If you’re being ridiculed, it’s because you’re making a fool of yourself – not because anyone else is wrong. Honestly, dude.
Why do you think calling for violence against the police is a bad thing? Is it bad, in your opinion, to call for violence against any group, regardless of what that group is?
Say for the sake of example that we were living in Nazi Germany. Would you say that calling for violence against the SS is as bad as calling for violence against Jews? I don’t think you would.
Granted, we are not in Nazi Germany. The police in America are not the SS. But there are plenty of legitimate problems with the police, including the murder of unarmed minorities going unpunished.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but I suspect you don’t believe that the police are bad enough to warrant calls for violence, and maybe that’s true. However, there are people who don’t think that’s true – they think the police, as an institution, are corrupt enough that they should see violent consequences.
Bit a side note, but I don’t know that I agree with calling for violence against the police. I don’t think it’s going to accomplish anything at this point because of the very real risk of extreme backlash. But I do understand why people want to.
That may not have been your point, but you made it badly. You cannot compare Black lives and blue lives as a meaningful comparison because, as the other user pointed out, membership in one is compulsory and optional in the other.
You may as well have said:
Imagine if a similar gif with “fuck people that don’t enjoy bestiality” was posted. You people are nuts.
…for all the relevance it would have to the point you’re trying to make.
Your point is that calling for violence on any one group is bad. That’s a fine point to argue, but using Black lives as an “equally bad” comparison point is nonsense.
before release
According to OP it hasn’t been released yet.
No, this is clearly a joke.
We don’t! When I was younger I had a theory that the brain is a 3D representation of an organ that exists in a higher dimension. Granted, I had (and still have) no relevant expertise to properly speculate on how that could work, but it was fun to think about.