Both. Both is fine.
Both. Both is fine.
Doesn’t really seem like the same motivation as what would suddenly lead to a 50% increase in adoption in the EU. I just don’t really see the cause and affect between apple prompting you and suddenly firefox uptick. I’m guessing most people who used to install it never realised just installing it didn’t make it the default (but they should’ve when they open any url).
Reading through the replies, I’m amazed anyone went through the effort to install Firefox but didn’t bother changing the default browser to it. Something in this story smells fishy.
after Apple started letting users choose their default browsers on iOS 17.4 in the EU last week.
Lol, srsly, why does anyone use apple devices willingly. Like for work I sorta get it if there’s no alternative but it really took government action to compell this extremely basic customisation.
That was your understanding. Clearly leah understood something else. And nothing youce shared so far excuses you’re actions. I repeat. Move on. Do something productive with your time.
Buddy… leah took credit for their own work. Anyone could’ve contributed a better patch than you in that week. You don’t get first dibs on feature contributions and you certainly don’t get a free pass to harass Foss maintainers when they prioritise better functional code than you’re own. Take the L. Move on.
She.
And how are they keeping anything together. Market share isn’t substantially better than before and rather than focusing on the product mozilla was created for they keep pivoting to weird BS like this AI grab. I actually think market shares gone up recently… cause google pushed through manifestv3. That would’ve happened even if mozilla did nothing. I think mozillq is still the better browser but that sure as hell doesn’t seem to be because of whose in charge.
Really interesting read. I love deep dives like this.
Yep. That’s what I plan to do, just a shame it isn’t already there… also that I’m travelling from tomorrow so might have to defer it for a bit XD.
Ooh, didn’t know about podman. That’s neat.
Edit: shame they didn’t include podman-compose as well.
Curious, how is this workflow working for you. I basically did the same thing, at this point the only real blockers are the screensizens is too small and I don’t like carrying separate keyboard and mice from my case.
I use docker so don’t really have to worry about reproducibility of the Services or configurations. Docker will fetch the right services and versions. I’ve documented the core configurations so I can set them back up relatively easily. Anything custom I haven’t documented I’ll just have to remember or find I need to reset up.
In general yes. You can think of each container in a docker network as a host and docker makes these hosts discoverable to each other. Docker also supports some other network types that may not follow this concept if you configure them as such (for example if you force all containers to use the same networking stack as one container (I do this with gluetun so I can run everything in a vpn) all services will be reachable only from the gluetun host instead of individual service hosts).
Furthermore services in a container are not exposed outside of it by default. You must explicitly state when a port in a container is reachable by your host (the ports: option).
But getting back to the question at hand, what you’re looking for is a reverse proxy. It’s a program that accepts requests from multiple requested and forwards them somewhere else. So you connect to the proxy and it can tell based on how you connect (the url) whether to send the request to sonarr or radarr. http://sonarr.localhost and http://radarr.localhost will both route to your proxy and the proxy will pass them to the respective services based on how you configure it. For this you can use nginx, but I’d recommend caddy as it’s what I’m using and it makes setting up things like this such a breeze.
That BPF workaround was so cool. I didn’t even realise you could write BPF filters in rust now. Thanks for sharing.
ForgeJo?
Wayland what? Wayland is just a protocol. You need a wayland supporting client. If no ones ported one to solaris then that’s not waylands fault. Frankly I question how mature any of those options would be if they did. Seems plasma hasn’t had any solaris support for almost a decade, for example. It has migrated to wayland tho.
Wayland is compatible with most X apps through xwayland. If you wanna avoid it then go ahead but pretending it’s not viable at all for anything ever is just stupid.
Both bash and zsh will block until the end of a clipboard input and require an explicit return after it to execute. IIRC this is enabled by default in zsh but can be set for bash. Frankly I’m amazed it isn’t the default everywhere.
aren’t I super clever for managing to create this hideously complicated Rube Goldberg machine to solve a problem caused by people not communicating with each other
It’s amazing how with a language as fragmented as c++ that everyone seems to be independently discovering warts in the proposed module implementation and no one seems to be coordinating things to enforce consistency across compilers. I get these are all separately maintained projects but god no ones gonna use the thing if everything supports it differently.
If you want a richer login authelia + caddy is good.