Ubuntu on Desktop I can understand.
Not anymore. A whole extra, unneeded, proprietary, locked-in package system. Ads in the default install.
There’s Mint, Pop!, and plenty of other options that actually respect the user.
No relation to the sports channel.
Ubuntu on Desktop I can understand.
Not anymore. A whole extra, unneeded, proprietary, locked-in package system. Ads in the default install.
There’s Mint, Pop!, and plenty of other options that actually respect the user.
Remember SOAP? Remember XML-RPC? Remember CORBA?
Those were not very good.
1993 or so, before kernel 1.0. Slackware on floppies, then Debian, then Ubuntu, then Mint, now Pop!_OS.
I got a rather profitable career out of it: went into IT during/after college, then got hired into a big Silicon Valley company, stayed in that area for several years, then quit during COVID.
Then it’s probably just more
. Again: your post did not contain enough information for anyone to provide an answer to your question.
Antivirus doesn’t do what it promises. The only general solution for a compromised system is a clean reinstall. (This is true in Windows too.)
A process can change its name. If I wanted to make sneaky malware for Linux, I’d have it call itself more
or something innocuous too.
The correct answer is “this is not enough information”. Why should a real more
process eat ¼ of a core for any substantial amount of time?
Create a new community. Host your own instance.
If you log out of websites & delete your cookies on Windows, random browsing may be more inconvenient there.
Fake headline.
That’s the main advantage of parted
over fdisk
+ mkfs
, really.
Sure, but if I were recommending a Linux OS to a first-time user, I wouldn’t recommend today’s Ubuntu as it is likely to lock them into a proprietary single-vendor system, which is contrary to one of the main points of promoting free software.
The first-time user might not immediately notice the difference, but it’s (unfortunately) bad for free software to have more new users starting on today’s Ubuntu.
This is pretty sad because Ubuntu used to be the obvious choice to recommend to new users.
Mint and pop are basically ubuntu.
Big difference: Pop, at least, does not push Canonical’s proprietary “Snap” nonsense. You can use it if you really want, but it’s not installed by default. No snapd
on my system, thanks.
This is what Debian is for.
Why Linux is portrayed as a Penguin?
For context, check this poster’s other recent works. They have a mistaken belief that they stand in a position of power & authority over the developers of free software they use.
Before I got around to learning vi
, I spent a few years using joe
, which seems to have fallen out of active development (the last release was in 2018). It’s a terminal-based editor that bears some resemblance to old DOS editors.
You can explore a GUI if it’s safe to do so. If a user has been burned by easily putting their system into an unrecoverable state, they develop a fear of exploring. “I don’t want to change anything; I might break my computer / lose all my work / get a virus!” is a really common fear.
It’s better that vulnerabilities be discussed openly. In general, people knowing the truth allows them to make better decisions.
enterprises
… can pay engineers, rather than expecting volunteers to fix everything for them.
Do consider that maybe the same people are both (1) abusing children themselves and (2) blaming child abuse on LGBT+ people.
I mean, if the GOP can do it, the chans can do it …
If you’re looking for commercial games on Linux, Steam has pretty much solved this with the “Steam Play” compatibility feature, which uses a customized version of WINE to run Windows games. For example, Baldur’s Gate 3 runs perfectly. It should work anywhere Steam does.