• 0 Posts
  • 51 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • I want to use Raylib, but mentioning it here on the fediverse doesn’t get much of a response (I can’t see a raylib community from my instance). My choice of language probably doesn’t help, though.

    My first issue is wanting vertex colors on 3D models and I am not getting this (this may be a problem with the bindings I’m using, naylib(nim-lang)). The second would be needing guidance for the 2D polygon text loader that I started.

    Maybe I could make simple GUI applications with raygui, but I don’t currently really have many viable ideas on what I would want to make.


    To OP: Another potential option is using Godot w/bindings. Design is pretty fast and flexible, then using signals is super easy.

    I’ve tested some frameworks (specific to my language, so not really helpful to most), the one that I liked more said it was declarative user interface framework based on GTK though I would prefer a similar thing for Qt and there wasn’t an ability to automatically scale text size to better fill the available button size (I was testing an adventure-book reader and hoping to use unicode characters).

    Frameworks for single page applications (or some other browser-based tech) might be ok for simple stuff. Similarly, I’ve liked the idea of TUI frameworks (yeah, because htop) but haven’t really tried that yet.




  • I am all of the issues to some degree and AI outputs to me* just seem like dairy-free maple-coconut water cheese. So personally I’ll just stick with nothing (substantial) until the format/workflow that I’m looking for (hopefully) becomes viable for me.

    Luckily writing a book or painting hyper-realism are not the only type of creativity.

    (also funnily enough, AI currently is just a different set of skills/knowledge especially for the better results or wrangling custom inputs/training/adjustments etc)

    *= Particularly what I can run locally, w/a 1050Ti. But also just really most examples of AI (aside from maybe the stuff that is either extremely overproduced/hand-picked or potentially faked)


  • insomniac_lemon@kbin.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If you’re a woman of the woods who will feed my brain to a bear, that’d put me at 80% on-board. As always, travel would be the issue.

    Though if I was awake for the eating part, I’d definitely make the joke “Is this a Tally Hall reference?” even though I made it now.


  • I meant newer than the context I stated (1983). And also ground floor stuff that doesn’t need internet (after install) and doesn’t need a purchase/sign-up. Available by default or not too obscure to get decent voices.

    There might be some half-decent voices somewhere, but it really just doesn’t seem like it’s night-and-day for the ground floor stuff from what I’ve seen. Maybe some vocaloid stuff but even that seems like a chore to do the phonemes manually to get expected pronunciation.










  • insomniac_lemon@kbin.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I would take many uncertain or potentially unsavory fates were they actual options (being a no-car shut-in makes it less likely), but a rock wouldn’t be one of them. I mean, unless maybe a Wile E. Coyote sort-of-way but still probably not because I’d hate to do the math wrong and get half-crushed.

    On a lighter note, I am imagining a girl SSH-ing into a single-board-computer in her head. Which is something I could see being possible for biohackers (if that’s the best term?) by now even if the actual brain connection isn’t there yet. Can’t imagine what it’d do, but I definitely could see a beep song or maybe even a cochlear bridge for music (though that’d be more interesting if it had integrated context somehow, help with mood or play appropriate thematic/atmospheric music, so that’d be closer to cyborg-level tech).



  • I know. They added some at one point and I installed an anti-CSD package, I’m also pretty sure they pulled back some of their plans because of backlash too.

    If they go full CSD I would probably need to find something else and probably just concede+just use the slimmest window theme there is rather than something frameless even (from what I’ve seen, other window theme systems are not as modular as xfwm which allows simply deleting the sides/bottom files etc).

    Someone could probably make this concept (frameless, minimal title bar, no title on maximized, no raise-on-focus, rolled-up windows, floating window buttons that are only on focused windows) into a simple window manager, probably not me any time soon though. And I’m not sure how easy that is on Wayland (I know options exist to make it easer–such as wlroots I think–though I don’t know how it’d compare to making something for X).