Favourite colour is orange?

As a tankie, who should you vote for in the 2025 election?

Actually interesting and factual. Thanks, I didn’t know

She also infamously took free milk away from schools

Ah maybe. I thought it was mocking people for “making up” genders. Like any good satire nowadays, it’s impossible to tell which it is.

One joke?

Ok but now Jesus has to release a Zeus diss track

Why would God do this tho

I’ve been using portainer for this and really like it. It does tether you into using docker images but that’s not really a bad thing nowadays.

Google let’s you filter images by transparent background which can be useful. But yes, I concur, I hope them very die.

Julian Casadankas

Least gay Lemming

You also don’t need the dash for the short options.

You know when you meet someone and you’re just like “oh boy, yeah, they’re evil. No humanity at all”

Even when I’m running apt directly? That seems insane.

I’m confused by this. If I run apt install, am I getting stuff from flatpak?

But Lisa needs braces

I think this is a fun and endearing project that the author should be proud of, and that id happily consider using in place of react or such.

However I don’t really see it as doing anything new. It sells “progressive enhancement” as a unique tenet, but then goes on to explain it’s just hydration which is available in a lot of competing frameworks.

It sells “separation of concerns” but that’s just redefining the term as separation of content from logic. Ultimately, you need to link your styles to your content and your logic to your components; I don’t see how this is any different from Vue for example. Worse, it removes scoped styles which I, and many, would argue is a worse separation of concerns by its actual academic definition.

Again, I commend the author, but I’d really think about reframing the whole sales pitch in terms of why it’s different or better rather than relying on buzzwords throughout.

Compared to react/Vue/etc.:

Why is your version of hydration better?

Why is your templating better?

Why is your component architecture better?

Did she bite on your chocolate chip bagel?

You did understand their point, they just didn’t argue it well.

Did you wet the bed?