• 0 Posts
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle



  • From a practical standpoint, it’s hard to imagine what you could possibly be doing where it’s beneficial to have a thousand tabs open.

    If I’m writing a research paper, I might want 5 or 10 tabs open at a given time. Let’s say I’m a little chaotic so I get up to 20. And then limitations on my working memory kick in, and having any more open tabs actually makes me worse off.

    But then let’s suppose it’s a thesis that’s 50 pages long. So I might be relying on 40 or 50 references. I’m not relying on them all at the same time, right? So I definitely don’t want to keep those tabs open all at the same time.

    What I could do, and what you could consider, is either bookmarking things or using archive.org to make a backup of the pages.

    In one of the other comments you mentioned Facebook. That has me a little concerned again with your objectives. If it’s something private on Facebook that can’t be recovered later, and you need something reliable, then you have no choice but to do long screenshots or scrolling videos. If it’s not reliable, then why do you care so much to keep the window open? Just close the window, remember whatever you remember, and move on with your life.

    Whatever you do, here’s a few rules of thumb… Your web browser is not an archiving tool. Printing to PDF is one way to archive things. There are other ways to archive things too. You don’t actually need to archive as much as you might think you need to archive. Most of the things that we think might be important now actually won’t be useful at all three months from now. Rarely would one actually want to have a thousand sources of information for any given task.





  • Twenty plus years we could have shared pop culture. If it was on the radio or popular cable TV, maybe many people saw it. But now there’s too much information, period. Everyone specializes. If you expect people to know their memes, you’re pressuring them to consume the same media they do. Not cool.

    So, float the meme, why not. But expect it to flop. Be happily surprised when it doesn’t.


  • orcrist@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRiots rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    As you pointed out, this is partly a matter of interpretation. So opinions could reasonably vary, and I respect that.

    I believe it’s clear enough that in this case, saying that the situation is just a riot, is a way of taking focus away from the other things that were happening. Perhaps it wasn’t a riot and then turned into one, and maybe we should be focusing on what happened first. Or perhaps there was a riot happening along with something else, and that second thing is worth mentioning.


  • orcrist@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneRiots rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    No. It’s not “just rioting”. Try that again without the value judgment.

    We see this type of hidden judgement on a regular basis. The key words are “just” and “only”. It’s an annoyingly effective rhetorical device, because the statement looks like an objective description of things when it’s not.







  • orcrist@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.mlIs there a downside to Flatpak?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For me, the question is why I should add an extra layer of complexity. If the things I use already work well using apt, and if most things are bundled in the default distro install, then my life is already good.

    This all depends on your software needs, if course. Some people are using a lot of new stuff, so the above setup leads to annoying situations.


  • orcrist@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerulemission
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That all depends on the industry in question. I’m not sure about Shell.

    But the key point is that regulating individual action, or focusing on individual action, is only a small part of the problem. We need to focus on the big polluters first and foremost. And we know who they are, even if we don’t know exactly how to parse the data.


  • orcrist@lemm.eeto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerulemission
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    You fell into the trap that this post is exposing. Of course personal action matters, everyone knows it and there’s no chance we’ll forget it, but the heavy polluting companies want to focus our attention on that alone, to keep it off of themselves. Please don’t assist them in doing so.