• 1 Post
  • 17 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 11th, 2023

help-circle
  • “In Nebraska Law Review: Bulletin, Professor Michael Conklin writes that the use of the small penis rule would be ineffective to defend against defamation lawsuits. The reasons given are that the statement that a person has a small penis can be taken as defamatory in itself; the use of the rule is effectively an admission that defamation did occur”






  • workerONE@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    The steamroller you are driving has lost its steering and is about to roll over a crowd of salesmen. Pump up the jam is playing on the radio and you are having a great time. You can turn the steamroller off to stop it before it runs over the salesmen but this will also turn off the radio. What do you do?


  • You should be able to send a letter that serves as a contract, and include an invoice to pay to start the contract. Then legally it would rely on the type of service you offer, but as far as invoicing before service starts that’s not legally a problem. They used to mail out magazine subscription offers, you would mail in a check and then your subscription would start.











  • workerONE@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI need Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m about half way through this video, I’d never seen it before. I think she offers some decent rebuttal and fact checking. I didn’t understand, and her listeners didn’t understand why she would say the Marxist Leninists are basically liberals who are apologetic to horrors committed by the left (but that’s not true, Marxist Leninists are not liberals), then she said she was being sarcastic- if you are fact checking then your statements should be taken at face value. I think her frustration comes from the lack of criticism of all of the failures of communist regimes. The Deprogram podcast with Hakim has an episode about the failures of communist parties, and though they mentioned the restriction of religious freedom, they completely skipped over major atrocities like China’s Land Reform Movement. I couldn’t imagine a party leader who was less qualified or more destructive to their own people than Mao was, it’s amazing that China is where it is today with a terrible history like that. But yeah, I’ve been waiting for Hakim to voice concerns about past atrocities and I haven’t heard anything.